Ayodhya case: Hearing in Ayodhya land dispute completed, Supreme Court reserved verdict #RamMandir #AyodhyaCase #AyodhyaHearing

0
Ayodhya case, Ayodhya case: Hearing in Ayodhya land dispute completed, Supreme Court reserved verdict #RamMandir #AyodhyaCase #AyodhyaHearing, ChambaProject.IN
Ayodhya case, Ayodhya case: Hearing in Ayodhya land dispute completed, Supreme Court reserved verdict #RamMandir #AyodhyaCase #AyodhyaHearing, ChambaProject.IN

Ayodhya case: Hearing in Ayodhya land dispute completed, Supreme Court reserved verdict: Hearing in Ayodhya land dispute case is over. Supreme Court reserved judgment in this case. The Supreme Court has given all the parties three days to submit written documents. Supreme Court took time till 5 pm today to complete the hearing, but it has been completed an hour before. Sharp arguments were made from the beginning of the hearing today.

When given the opportunity, arguments were started by the All India Hindu Mahasabha, the atmosphere of the court was warm. The book was presented in the court on behalf of the Hindu Mahasabha lawyer Vikas Singh, on which the Muslim side’s lawyer Rajiv Dhawan raised strong objections. He also tore the map given by Vikas Singh. Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi objected strongly to this.

Ayodhya land dispute case update-

– Hindu Mahasabha lawyer Varun Sinha said that the Supreme Court has reserved its verdict. The court has made it clear that the decision in this case will come within 23 days.

– The Supreme Court took time till 5 pm today to complete the hearing, but it has been completed an hour earlier.

Hearing in Ayodhya land dispute case has been completed. Supreme Court reserved judgment in this case. The Supreme Court took time till 5 pm today to complete the hearing, but it has been completed an hour before.

– In connection with the coverage of the hearing of the Ayodhya case, the News Broadcasting Standards Authority (NBS) has issued an advisory, which states – 1. There should not be any speculation on court proceedings. 2. The facts of the hearing should be reported only. 3. No footage of demolition of a Masjid should be used. 4. No festival should be telecasted for court hearings. 5. The case should not show extreme views in any kind of debate.

Kunal Kishore, a publisher of a map torn by Rajiv Dhawan, said that Dhawan is an intellectual. If he had any objections to the map, he would object to it only when it was filed.

– Advocate of the Muslim side, Rajiv Dhawan said that there are variations in the arguments of the All India Hindu Mahasabha.

On the rumors of withdrawal of appeal by the Sunni Waqf Board, I have no knowledge of withdrawal of the appeal by the Sunni Waqf Board.

According to news agency ANI

– According to news agency ANI, Rajiv Dhawan, a lawyer for the Muslim side, tore the papers and maps handed over by the advocate of the All India Hindu Mahasabha to the court.

Also Read this:   Rajnath Singh told Kashmir internal issue, told Congress - don't internationalize it

PM Modi’s big attack on Congress, said – Nationalism under familyhood, now the last breaths, read big things
PM Modi’s big attack on Congress, said – Nationalism under familyhood, now the last breaths, read big things
Also read

After the counsel of All India Hindu Mahasabha’s counsel in the case, CJI Ranjan Gogoi expressed his displeasure and said that if debate and arguments continue like this, we will go out of court.

– Counsel for the Muslim side said in the apex court that he would accept the decision of the Supreme Court.

– CJI Ranjan Gogoi rejected the application of intervention of one party Hindu Maya Sabha in the case, saying that the matter will be closed by 5 pm today. Enough now …

40 Days Hearing Complete

– Hearing on the 40th day has started in the Ram Janmabhoomi case. The Chief Justice said that the hearing should be completed by 5 pm today.

Decision may come on November 4 or 5

Also Read this:   CASE FILED FOR DRYING UNDERWEAR, UNIQUE CASE CAME OUT FROM MUZAFFARNAGAR

In this case, the Allahabad High Court, in its judgment in 2010, ordered 2.77 acres of disputed land to be shared equally between the three parties – Sunni Waqf Board, Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lala – which has been challenged in the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court heard 14 appeals against the said order of the High Court. According to the news agency ANI, a decision in this matter may come on November 4 or 5.

Cancellation of officers’ holidays till 30 November in UP, Section-144 in Ayodhya

In view of the possibility of an early verdict from the Supreme Court on the Ayodhya land dispute and security concerns over the upcoming festivals, the administration has imposed Section 144 in Ayodhya till December 10. According to the news agency ANI, the holidays of all police and administration officers posted in the film in Uttar Pradesh have been canceled till 30 November. Not only this, instructions have been issued to officers to remain in their headquarters.

Time to rectify the historical mistake

On Tuesday, Hindu party lawyer K.K. Parasaran, in his argument, termed the construction of the Masjid as a historic mistake. He said that the Mughal ruler Babur built a Masjid about 433 years ago at the birthplace of Lord Rama in Ayodhya, which was a ‘historical mistake’. Today he needs to improve. He also said that India is a civilized country which never attacked any other country.

Namaz can be done in another Masjid

The counsel for the Hindu side K. Parasaran yesterday said in his arguments that there are a total of 50 to 80 Masjids in Ayodhya apart from this place. Muslims can offer Namaz anywhere, but for Hindus it is the birthplace of Lord Rama and cannot be changed. When asked about the number of Masjids in Ayodhya, the lawyer for the Muslim side, Rajiv Dhawan, questioned that how many temples there are there. Parasaran said that this is also according to the population.

Also Read these

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here